Skip to main content
BoF Logo

Agenda-setting intelligence, analysis and advice for the global fashion community.

Capri’s Versace Blunders Opened Door to Prada Takeover

The US group sold Versace at a roughly $700 million loss after a strategy rooted in more muted designs and higher prices sent sales growth significantly off course.
Versace store | Source: Shutterstock
Versace store | Source: Shutterstock (Shutterstock)

The Daily Digest Newsletter

The essential daily round-up of fashion news, analysis, and breaking news alerts.
Plus, access one complimentary BoF Professional article of your choice, each month.

Fashion executive John Idol thought Versace leaned too much on ornate designs and aimed to fix it by dialling things down, then boosting prices.

When his company, Capri Holdings Ltd., acquired the fashion house in 2018, he said his strategy would double the brand’s revenue over the next decade. Six years later, that vision has unraveled. He’s sold Versace to Prada SpA for $1.38 billion, a roughly $700 million loss, and sales growth is significantly off course.

Capri is expecting Versace to report revenue of around $813 million in the current fiscal year that ended in March. That’s below the $843 million in sales it reported in fiscal year 2020, the first full year that Capri was running the brand.

Versace’s future now rests with Prada, a company that’s nimbly navigated the recent slowdown in luxury spending. Revenue at Prada, which also includes the Miu Miu brand, rose 17 percent in 2024. By contrast, analysts surveyed by Bloomberg expect Versace to report a decline of around 20 percent in sales for the fiscal year that ends in March versus the prior year. Capri also owns the Michael Kors and Jimmy Choo brands, which have reported sales declines, too.

ADVERTISEMENT

Capri said in a statement on Thursday announcing the deal that it would use the proceeds from the Versace sale to make investments in Michael Kors.

“We also believe a sale of Jimmy Choo would be the right move for Capri,” Bernstein analyst Aneesha Sherman wrote in a research note Thursday.

When Idol took over Versace, the brand was known for its ornate designs and its signature Barocco print, but he later steered it toward the more muted “quiet luxury” trend. Idol said the shift was necessary because Versace had become overreliant on the print. “You don’t want a store that is 70 percent Barocco — and that became a bit of a crutch for the company,” Idol, who is chairman and chief executive officer of Capri, told analysts in February.

He also acknowledged the shift was too abrupt. While affluent shoppers embraced the more muted designs, the mid-tier shoppers who drive Versace’s sales did not. Revenue growth started to slow.

“It’s not been the turnaround story that they wanted it to be,” Sherman said in an interview. “The strategies haven’t been the right strategies.”

Compounding the problem, Versace hiked prices and reduced the amount of affordable items it sold. “We went too far, too fast,” Idol said in February. “Customers who used to shop with us came in and said, ‘I like that, but I can’t afford all of that,‘” Idol said. “Probably the customers are sitting there saying, ‘Wait a minute. What happened to the old Versace?‘”

Now, Versace is scrambling to undo the damage. The brand is lowering price points on some core items: In the fall, silk shirts will start at $990 instead of around $1,500, the company told Bloomberg News, and its sneakers have become more affordable. Its Galaxia style, for example, starts at $550.

The brand also reduced discounts. While end-of-season sales on apparel and footwear still start at 50 percent, the second markdown is now 60 percent, the company said, versus 70 percent in the past. And Versace stopped putting handbags on sale at its full-price boutiques.

ADVERTISEMENT

The shift “is painful,” Idol said, “but it is the right thing to do.”

In March, the company announced that Donatella Versace was stepping down as chief creative officer, a role she’s held since 1997. She’s become chief brand ambassador and supports the company’s philanthropic efforts. Former Miu Miu executive Dario Vitale succeeded her on Apr. 1.

“We are confident that his talent and vision will be instrumental to Versace’s future growth,” Idol said about Vitale in a statement.

Capri’s chief financial officer Thomas J. Edwards left in April for the role of CFO and chief operating officer at Macy’s Inc. “His departure comes at a precarious time,” Telsey Advisory Group analyst Dana Telsey wrote in a research note. “Leadership transitions always carry an element of risk.”

Risks have increased further, and Capri’s shares have fallen further since President Donald Trump pledged to implement sweeping tariffs.

Pyrrhic Victory

The sale of Versace to Prada is a Pyrrhic victory for Idol, who has led Capri since 2003. Wall Street cheered when Idol appeared to have found a potential buyer for Versace: Capri shares rose on Mar. 3 after Bloomberg News reported on the deal talks.

But Idol’s plan wasn’t to split Capri into pieces. He aimed to sell the whole company to Tapestry Inc., which owns Coach and Kate Spade, for $8.5 billion in 2023. That would have afforded Idol a grand exit after decades at the helm of Capri. What could have been a crowning achievement, though, was toppled last year when a federal judge ruled the combination of the rival conglomerates would harm competition in the US handbag market.

Idol, 66, had already tried to take steps to ease out of his day-to-day CEO role in 2021. Capri’s board appointed Joshua Schulman to lead the company so Idol could move on to become executive chairman. Several months later, in an unexplained and surprising about-face, Capri said Schulman was leaving the company and Idol would remain CEO and chairman.

ADVERTISEMENT

While the battle over Tapestry’s acquisition of Capri was playing out in the courts, Idol and his team didn’t appear to be drawing up a Plan B for their remaining brands.

“The company used the excuse of the deal with Tapestry for its inertia,” GlobalData analyst Neil Saunders wrote in a research note in February. “That excuse is no longer viable, and the company needs to do the heavy lifting of reinvention.”

By Jeannette Neumann

Further Reading
In This Article

© 2025 The Business of Fashion. All rights reserved. For more information read our Terms & Conditions

More from Luxury
How rapid change is reshaping the tradition-soaked luxury sector in Europe and beyond.

Is the Art Market AI-Proof?

While artists are experimenting with artificial intelligence to produce work, the technology won’t disrupt the business of art, argues Marc Spiegler.


The BoF Podcast | Inside The Great Luxury Reset

Imran Amed, founder and CEO of The Business of Fashion, and Luca Solca, managing director of luxury goods at Bernestein, speak to System Magazine’s Jonathan Wingfield about how luxury fashion is navigating economic headwinds, shifting consumer values and the urgent need for creative renewal.


A Slap on the Wrist Won’t Solve Luxury’s Sweatshops Problem

This week, Italy’s Competition Authority closed a probe into whether Dior misled consumers about working conditions at its suppliers without finding any wrongdoing. But a new case linking Valentino to poor labour practices suggests this is a problem that won’t go away easily.


Trump Tariffs Hit European Luxury, Shares Tank

LVMH and Hermès stock fell about 3 percent and 4 percent respectively, in line with sector peers including Kering, Prada and Burberry, after the US president announced a 50 percent duty on imports from the European Union.


view more

The Daily Digest Newsletter

The essential daily round-up of fashion news, analysis, and breaking news alerts.
Plus, access one complimentary BoF Professional article of your choice, each month.

The Business of Fashion

Agenda-setting intelligence, analysis and advice for the global fashion community.
CONNECT WITH US ON